How accurate is an exercise stress test for detecting coronary artery disease? 

For decades, the treadmill test (exercise ECG) was the go-to method for diagnosing heart issues. However, medical understanding has evolved. While the test is excellent for assessing how much work your heart can handle, its ability to pinpoint specific blocked arteries is not perfect. Today, it is often used to assess the severity of symptoms rather than to diagnose the disease from scratch, as newer scans offer greater precision. 

What We’ll Discuss in This Article 

• The basic function of an exercise stress test (GXT). 

• Why it is considered a ‘functional’ rather than ‘anatomical’ test. 

• The statistical accuracy (sensitivity vs. specificity). 

• Why false positives are more common in women. 

• The shift in NICE guidelines toward CT Angiograms. 

• The role of ‘imaging’ stress tests (Echo/MRI) for better accuracy. 

• When a stress test is still the best option. 

How accurate is the standard treadmill test? 

The standard exercise stress test is moderately accurate but has significant limitations. It has a sensitivity of approximately 68% and a specificity of 77%, as is also confirmed by a NCBI study (2017). This means it misses about 30% of people who actually have heart disease (false negatives) and incorrectly flags about 20% of healthy people as having a problem (false positives). 

Why It Misses Blockages 

The test relies on the heart muscle complaining (via electrical signals) when it runs out of oxygen. 

• Threshold: A coronary artery usually needs to be blocked by at least 70% to restrict blood flow enough to show up on an ECG during exercise. 

• Mild Disease: If you have a 40% or 50% blockage, your blood flow might still be adequate even when running, so the test will come back ‘normal’ despite the presence of plaque. 

False Positives: The Gender Gap 

Women are significantly more likely than men to receive a ‘false positive’ result on a standard exercise ECG. Hormonal factors and breast tissue can interfere with the electrical recording, creating patterns that look like heart damage when the heart is actually healthy. For this reason, doctors often prefer stress echocardiograms (ultrasound) or nuclear scans for female patients. 

Anatomical vs. Functional Accuracy 

To understand accuracy, you must distinguish between seeing the ‘pipes’ and seeing the ‘flow.’ An exercise stress test is a functional test, it tells you if the blood flow is adequate under stress. It does not show you the anatomy of the arteries. A CT Coronary Angiogram (anatomical) is far more accurate (over 95%) at detecting the actual presence of atherosclerosis. 

• CT Angiogram: Sees the plaque itself. (High diagnostic accuracy). 

• Stress Test: Sees the effect of the plaque. (High functional relevance). 

Why have NICE guidelines changed? 

Due to the limitations in accuracy, NICE guidelines (CG95) were updated to recommend CT Coronary Angiography as the first-line test for stable chest pain, replacing the standard exercise ECG. The exercise ECG is now primarily used to assess exercise capacity, check for arrhythmias induced by exertion, or for patients who cannot undergo a CT scan. 

Improving Accuracy: Adding Imaging 

The accuracy of a stress test jumps significantly if you add imaging. A ‘Stress Echocardiogram’ (ultrasound before and after exercise) or a ‘Nuclear Stress Test’ (using a tracer dye) allows doctors to watch the heart wall motion. If a segment of the heart stops moving correctly during exercise, it pinpoints a blockage with much higher reliability than the ECG trace alone. 

• Standard ECG Stress: ~68% Sensitivity. 

• Stress Echocardiogram: ~80-85% Sensitivity. 

• Nuclear Perfusion: ~85-90% Sensitivity. 

Conclusion 

While the exercise stress test is a safe and useful tool for measuring heart fitness and symptom thresholds, it is no longer the ‘gold standard’ for diagnosing coronary artery disease due to its potential for false results. If your treadmill test is normal but your symptoms persist, do not ignore them, further anatomical testing, like a CT scan, may be required to see what the electrical trace missed. 

If you experience chest pain that comes on with exertion and goes away with rest, but your initial stress test was ‘clear,’ ask your doctor if further imaging is needed. 

Authority Snapshot 

This article was written by Dr. Rebecca Fernandez, a UK-trained physician (MBBS) with extensive experience in cardiology and diagnostics. Having supervised numerous stress tests and interpreted their results for patient care, Dr. Fernandez explains the strengths and limitations of this common procedure. This content has been reviewed to ensure alignment with NHS and NICE protocols, helping you understand why your doctor might choose, or avoid, this specific test. 

Internal Link Suggestions 

• ‘what is a CT coronary angiogram’ 

• ‘symptoms of heart attack in women’ 

• ‘benefits of stress echocardiogram’ 

• ‘understanding heart rate zones’